為了使考生的GRE備考更有效率,考生需要時刻關注GRE官方題庫的考試動態,以便及時調整複習計畫,避免因為疏忽而錯失獲得高分的機會。2015年 GRE作文官方對Issue和Argument分別擴充了幾道題目,GRE考生們不可忽視的內容。今天分享一題官方GRE寫作argument新增考題及分析, 希望考生可以按照最新的題庫進行複習。
新增題目編號:175.
The following appeared as a letter to the editor from the owner of a skate shop in Central Plaza.
"Two years ago the city council voted to prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. They claimed that skateboard users were responsible for litter and vandalism that were keeping other visitors from coming to the plaza. In the past two years, however, there has been only a small increase in the number of visitors to Central Plaza, and litter and vandalism are still problematic. Skateboarding is permitted in Monroe Park, however, and there is no problem with litter or vandalism there. In order to restore Central Plaza to its former glory, then, we recommend that the city lift its prohibition on skateboarding in the plaza."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
★ 寫作思路
第一點:兩年前的prohibition是否真正有力實施,a small increase 到底是多少,表達太模糊“still problematic”的具體情況怎樣,和兩年前相比,問題真的沒有減少嗎; no problem about MP具體情況怎樣?真的沒有任何問題嗎?
第二點:對於CP,遊客減少真的是因為prohibiting skateboarding,沒有其它原因嗎?即使the problems are still amazing, the problems of CP沒有其它原因嗎?對於MP, MP在允許skateboarding時,沒有其它措施嗎?
第三點:CP以前的glory具體情況怎樣?CP 與MP情況完全一致嗎?
留言列表